![]()
“Wait, wait, like Google Earth? You can’t spin a globe on Google Earth so I have to go find someone el…” “I know, I know, you’ve got this FCP footage you wanted me to edit, but I just couldn’t bring myself to buy a computer that I can’t spin a globe on.” “What are you talking about? I wasn’t asking you to spin a globe I wanted you to edit this footage…” “Hey, I really wanted to seal this deal with you, but right before I bought the computer, I realized I couldn’t spin a globe on it.” Or, I guess, they could go to the producer and let them know, You’re pissed so they don’t have to be? You can be assured that folks buying a $50,000 system today are doing so because they’ve got an opportunity to make WAY MORE than that back. Otherwise, I’d keep using the codecs that have made me money for years. If better is an Apple Silicon Mac, then I’d get one when it’s available. Yes, primarily because if I have the money to drop of a $50,000 machine and I need better, like “make more money from my work” better, then I’d get better. SEVERAL MACOS MONTEREY UNAVAILABLE MACS PROYou might have benefited from a pro app updating to leverage new hardware, but that could happen regardless of whatever computer you bought, like ray-tracing support from a newer GPU.Īnd even though Apple has said there's another Intel Mac in the works, doesn't mean it'll ever come to fruition. But in all seriousness, if you're going to drop that amount of cash, then you are probably going to have done some homework, and have seen that they already will replace this Mac with a different architecture.Ĭhances are that your workflows you are leveraging a Mac Pro for are unlikely to be inhibited by a few yet-to-be unreleased features in a future OS. As a consumer, you can make an informed decision based on what information is already out there, regardless of whatever hyperbolic marketing you may encounter.Ī typical person isn't going to purchase a Mac Pro because of the marketing they saw. Once the transition to AS was announced, and they did declare that eventually everything would be AS, the deprecation began. It isn't being deprecated behind the scenes. SEVERAL MACOS MONTEREY UNAVAILABLE MACS SOFTWAREIt’s likely that a software only implementation of these features wouldn’t run as well, even on the 27” iMac (least of all on something like a 2019 MacBook Air). True, though the processors in them definitely don’t have the same oomph as the Mac Pro’s. SEVERAL MACOS MONTEREY UNAVAILABLE MACS BLUETOOTHLike buying a Bluetooth receiver (a device for allowing Bluetooth audio sources to work with wired, especially 3.5mm, audio) when what you need is a Bluetooth transmitter (a device that takes wired audio, especially 3.5mm, and transmits it to a Bluetooth headset or speaker). That said, if you’re buying online and you haven’t done due diligence on the product’s suitability for your needs, that’s on you. They might even ask a few questions about your use case to see if x86 is a good fit, or if you should move to Apple Silicon instead. It’s likely that a software only implementation of these features wouldn’t run as well, even on the 27” iMac (least of all on something like a 2019 MacBook Air).īut if you were to go into an Apple Store or authorized third party Mac store today (assuming they’re open in your area, of course), I’d imagine they wouldn’t let you buy an Intel Mac without an awareness of the M1 alternatives (unless it seems like you really know what you’re talking about, perhaps). :-DĬlick to expand.True, though the processors in them definitely don’t have the same oomph as the Mac Pro’s. Oh it is still have a headphone jack.” or ”Still has a charger in the box.” The Samsung ads do not age well, as they follow quickly behind, but they are not as cringe-inducing as the Intel ones. ”The Galaxy S-something is words, words, words, words. It is always funny that they tend to follow Apple decisions on things about which they made fun of Apple first, but they are usually ”in jokes” like: Even Samsung usually does it better than the Intel ads. This is just curiosity (and is a serious question). I cannot think of a case where they called each other out in an ad.įacebook as released statements attacking App Tracking Transparency, but that was not a comparison. Google and Apple tend to be more clever when poking fun at each other, more a visual gag or elliptical reference. Click to expand.I am curious if you can come up with an Apple ad or statement that mentions either Google or Facebook (or for that matter a Google or Facebook ad that mentions Apple) by name that is comparable to the Intel ads. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |